RSS Feed

Kimyo na Sasaku (Strange Circus) (2005): Ring After Ring

Kimyo na Sasaku (Strange Circus) (Shion Sono, 2005)

Masumi Miyazaki, except for her face, is buried in a bed of roses on the movie's poster.

Normally I look up obscure lyrics and quote them. I refuse to do it for this one. Bring your own BonJovi.
photo credit: IMDB

I know some folks who think Shion Sono is a demigod incarnate, and who think he’s one of the best filmmakers walking the planet today. I have never been one of them; he’s made some very good movies over the years, but he’s always been kind of hit-or-miss with me. I sat down with Sono’s 2005 effort Strange Circus last night, and this one definitely falls on the miss side of the mark—in fact, I think it is my least favorite of the Sono pictures I have seen so far.

Two children push a TV on a cart down a red hallway in a still from the film.

When you see the movie, this still will make sense. …maybe.
photo credit:

Plot: Taeko (A Watcher in the Attic‘s Masumi Miyazaki in, to date, her final screen appearance) is a novelist who has been struggling with her most recent creation, a story about a young girl named Mitsuko (The Great Yokai War‘s Mai Takahashi) whose family life is almost unspeakably traumatic. (I say “almost” because, obviously, Taeko is writing it.) She suffers terrifying abuse at the hands of both parents, sexual from her father and physical and emotional from her mother. The first half hour of this film is a depiction of the events in the novel (without telling you that these events are from a novel), and it’s pretty ugly stuff to watch. We then meet Yûji (Samurai Zombie‘s Issei Ishida), Taeko’s personal assistant, who is intrigued with the story and is trying discreetly to find out how much of it, if any, is based on Taeko’s own life.

The ringmaster of the titular circus in a still from the film.

“I grew up idolizing Divine…”
photo credit: Sound on Sight

The main problem with the film is its climax. The movie has spent a good deal of time trying to get you to buy into the universe Sono, who also wrote, is pitching here. And as distasteful as the movie is, he almost (though not quite) succeeds in creating a coherent, internally consistent universe. And then, well, there’s the climax, and all the bombs he drops that require you to stretch disbelief about a dozen times farther than you’ve already stretched it to buy what he’s been selling you up until now. I have seen at least one article, in Sound on Sight, saying that people are criticizing movies for having twists (and specifically going off briefly on M. Night Shyamalan). The problem is not that there is a twist. The problem is that the twist stretches the bounds of credulity in a movie that will already be difficult for users to stomach. Why add on unbelievability? **

Engsubbed trailer.

About Robert "Goat" Beveridge

Media critic (amateur, semi-pro, and for one brief shining moment in 2000 pro) since 1986. Guy behind noise/powerelectronics band XTerminal (after many small stints in jazz, rock, and metal bands). Known for being tactless but honest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: